Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
1. CCPs Miners are "Clay Pidgeons" mentality - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Danni stark wrote: Nahkep Narmelion wrote: The mackinaw after 242.51212 seconds drops 2 units of ice dafuq am i reading? that's abhorrent. Yeah, I could fit it to maximize yield, but if you look at dead mackinaws they are indeed **** f...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2013.05.15 13:52:00
|
2. CCPs Miners are "Clay Pidgeons" mentality - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Danni stark wrote: Lord Battlestar wrote: Miners are just way overreacting. 90% of the miners who die, do so because they are **** fit. I can't tell you how many times I look on killboards and see macks fit with just a survey scanner, no tan...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2013.05.15 01:14:00
|
3. Stated Invention success percentages vs actual values - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Luigi Vercotti ....or is my sample size not large enough yet? Actually your sample size is 14. You've run 14 invention jobs, not 140. So your sample is way to small, IMO. I would argue that you should to at least 86 more...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2011.05.16 16:08:00
|
4. Invention Results - in Science and Industry [original thread]
RaTTuS wrote: I won't say how many this sample represents apart from it is over 1000 now for some figures :- total results 4/4/4 50.73% [above average] 5/4/5 53.06% [above average] 5/5/5 46.91% [below average] results since last patch 4/4/4...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2011.04.07 21:18:00
|
5. POS Costs - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Boreesh Originally by: Katanisk Enriched Uranium - 8,700ISK/U - 25,056,000.00 ISK Oxygen - 225ISK/U - 4,050,000.00 ISK Mechanical Parts - 10,000ISK/U - 35,996,364.00 ISK Coolant - 9,439ISK/U - 54,684,864.00 ISK Robot...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2011.02.04 17:11:00
|
6. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Quote: I'm sure that CCP had some reason that they didn't remove T2 BPOS - like T2 modules becoming very scarce if invention should fail. But it didn't, and invention turned out to be the silver/magic bullet. T2 prices tumbled, productio...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.12.28 01:33:00
|
7. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Liang Nuren Originally by: Nahkep Narmelion Quote: Resources are finite so if you want to make a change in one area it will likely drain resources from other areas CCP is working on. Please go learn how ...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.12.28 00:52:00
|
8. Alternative ideas to removing T2 BPO's - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Quote: For extremely low demand items, where there's less demand than even what existing T2 BPOs can easily produce, the prices go down towards near-BPO-cost levels. And who exactly sets that bottom cost ? It's not T2 BPO owners, it's moon m...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.12.22 22:53:00
|
9. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
If people believe something that is false to be true, the solution is not to cater to the ignorant, but education. You don't run around burning people at the stake calling the heretics because their notion that the Earth revolves around the sun up...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.12.22 22:49:00
|
10. Alternative ideas to removing T2 BPO's - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Liang, If you are going to fix posts, try to do so in a coherent manner. Sure, a T2 BPO can shut out inventors, but he can't raise prices, if he does then the inventors will enter and no longer be shut out. Simple as that, really. Quote: Y...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.12.22 22:37:00
|
11. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Hahahah...silly child. T2 BPOs then have zero impact on you since it is invention that sets prices.
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.12.22 22:15:00
|
12. Alternative ideas to removing T2 BPO's - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Quote: Look how you exactly proved my point. You are aware that this is a perfect example of a dysfunctional market? Now, its an example of limit pricing. So long as invention provides a credible threat of entry then the incumbent (the T...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.12.22 22:11:00
|
13. Alternative ideas to removing T2 BPO's - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Quote: WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG. Investments include your personal time. You are vastly over stating the time component. Yes, logging in once and starting 1 job is fine, but then he wont make nearly as ...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.12.22 22:05:00
|
14. Alternative ideas to removing T2 BPO's - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Liang, The do not have an enormous advantage. They can only shut out inventors by keeping prices below the price that would provide profits to inventors. Really. This narrative of yours makes absolutely no sense. Yes, T2 BPO olders can ear...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.12.22 21:36:00
|
15. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Liang Nuren Originally by: Nahkep Narmelion You have to show that they currently do damage to the game. Sure, I'd be glad to explain that to you again. Its pretty simple afterall, and even my grade school childre...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.12.22 19:40:00
|
16. Alternative ideas to removing T2 BPO's - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Liang Nuren Edited by: Liang Nuren on 22/12/2010 03:55:56 Of course you have made a profit with invention. My contention is not that invention is not profitable . My contention is that T2 BPOs represent an unfair distri...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.12.22 19:07:00
|
17. Alternative ideas to removing T2 BPO's - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Quote: And this right here illustrates exactly why T2 BPOs are incredibly overpowered God Mode tools. If it's too much work for you to employ T2 BPOs (lol), then how much more work is it for someone to run dozens of characters on many accoun...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.12.22 01:43:00
|
18. Alternative ideas to removing T2 BPO's - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Quote: T1 BPO ME/PE levels affect the resulting T2 BPC Not necessarily a direct match (i.e perfect ME BPO = perfect ME BPC) as I think that's too much of a boost. Translating the ME level to a percentage of perfect ME, then a percentage of t...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.12.22 01:33:00
|
19. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Liang Nuren (3) you consider T2 BPOs to be poor game design, and they should be removed regardless of price before they do further damage to the game. -Liang You have to show that they currently do damage to the gam...
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.12.22 01:28:00
|
20. Public petition to STOP T2 BPO - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Voogru Originally by: Michael Zign Regret investing in manufacture as unlimited BPO ruin it. Are those TEARS I see coming from your inventor eyes? Yeah...who knew Alanis Morissette played Eve.
- by Nahkep Narmelion - at 2010.12.22 01:14:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |